Ep 200  |  Ted Parson

Will We Artificially Cool the Planet? The Science and Politics of Geoengineering

Check out this podcast

The Great Simplification

Description

Global heating continues, despite the increased use of renewable energy sources and international policies attempting otherwise. Even as emissions reduction efforts continue, our world faces more extreme weather, sea level rise, and human health impacts, all of which are projected to accelerate in the coming decades. This raises an important but controversial question: at what point might more drastic interventions, like geoengineering, become necessary in order to cool the planet?

In this episode, Nate interviews Professor Ted Parson about solar geoengineering (specifically stratospheric aerosol injection) as a potential response to severe climate risks. They explore why humanity may need to consider deliberately cooling Earth by spraying reflective particles in the upper atmosphere, how the technology would work, as well as the risks and enormous governance challenges involved. Ted emphasizes the importance of having these difficult conversations now, so that we’re prepared for the wide range of climate possibilities in the future.

How does stratospheric aerosol injection actually work? What is the likelihood that a major nation (or rogue billionaire) might employ this approach in the next thirty years? What ethical, moral, and biophysical concerns should we consider as we weigh the costs and benefits of further altering Earth’s planetary balance?

About Ted Parson

Edward A. (Ted) Parson is Dan and Rae Emmett Professor of Environmental Law and Faculty Director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the University of California, Los Angeles. Parson studies international environmental law and policy, the societal impacts and governance of disruptive technologies including geoengineering and artificial intelligence, and the political economy of regulation. 

His most recent books are The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change (with Andrew Dessler), and A Subtle Balance: Evidence, Expertise, and Democracy in Public Policy and Governance, 1970-2010. His 2003 book, Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy, won the Sprout Award of the International Studies Association and is widely recognized as the authoritative account of the development of international cooperation to protect the ozone layer.

In addition to his academic positions, Parson has worked and consulted for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Office of Technology Assessment of the U.S. Congress, the Privy Council Office of the Government of Canada, and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).

In French, we have a motto that says that a simple drawing is often better than a long explanation. Jean-Marc Jancovici Carbone 4 President

That’s very understandable because with left atmosphere thinking, one of the problems is that you see everything as a series of problems that must have solutions. Iain McGilchrist Neuroscientist and Philosopher

We can’t have hundreds and hundreds of real relationships that are healthy because that requires time and effort and full attention and awareness of being in real relationship and conversation with the other human. Nate Hagens Director of ISEOF

This is the crux of the whole problem. Individual parts of nature are more valuable than the biocomplexity of nature. Thomas Crowther Founder Restor

Show Notes & Links to Learn More

Download transcript

The TGS team puts together these brief references and show notes for the learning and convenience of our listeners. However, most of the points made in episodes hold more nuance than one link can address, and we encourage you to dig deeper into any of these topics and come to your own informed conclusions.

00:00 – Ted Parson info + works

00:59 – Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment 

04:08 – Millions of people die each year from inaction on global heating

04:23 – June 2024 marked one year of global temperatures at 1.5ºC above pre-industrial temperatures

04:45 – Wood Mackenzie’s 2 – 3.1ºC outlooks for the energy transition

05:16 – International Energy Agency: “The world now invests almost twice as much in clean energy as it does in fossil fuels…”

05:34 – The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Global greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced 43% by 2030

06:18 – Extreme flooding in Pakistan, Heatwaves in India

06:58 – Precipitation extremes at 1.5ºC warming

07:20 – Richter scale

08:00 – Heat wave effects on human health and productivity

08:36 – Negative emissions

09:35 – Geoengineering

09:45 – The Blue Marble photograph

10:19 – White roofs to help with solar reflectivity, Forests, snow cover, and albedo

11:30 – Urban heat island effect

12:09 – Dark urban surfaces absorb more heat

12:18 – Thermal absorption of brick

12:54 – Extreme heat is a threat in rural areas

13:09 – Changes in U.S. seasonal temperatures 

14:30 – Marine cloud brightening 

15:13 – Space sunshade 

15:33 – The Police – King of Pain

16:49 – Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

17:25 – Where air pollution comes from

17:43 – Acid rain, Tropospheric ozone pollution, Health problems due to fine particulates

17:58 – Atmospheric sulfur cooling the planet

18:47 – Volcanic effects on climate change, The sulfur cycle

19:29 – Mount Pinatubo eruption and its effect on global climate 

19:48 – Post-eruption cooling effect

20:05 – Aerosols in nature

21:15 – Lifetime of pollutants in the troposphere

21:27 – Stratospheric residence time

22:34 – 2025 Congressional subcommittee on transparency regarding government weather and climate engineering 

22:44 – NOAA weather modification project reports

24:14 – Edward Parson and David W. Keith – Solar Geoengineering: History, Methods, Governance, Prospects

25:08 – 1997* study on stratospheric aerosol injection

25:56 – Bala Govindasamy and Ken Caldeira – Geoengineering Earth’s radiation balance to mitigate CO2-induced climate change

27:48 – Geoengineering can restore surface temperature for >90% of the Earth’s area

28:00 – Anthony Harding, et al, – Impact of solar geoengineering on temperature-attributable mortality

28:24 – Solar geoengineering could impact ozone chemistry, create acid rain

29:55 – Ted Parson, et al. – Evaluating the efficacy and equity of environmental stopgap measures

30:11 – Injecting 12 million tons of sulfur dioxide per year would cool the planet by around 0.6°C

31:52 – Optimal injection locations, rates, and heights

34:40 – Costs of stratospheric aerosol injection

35:28 – Limitations on existing jet engine types needed for this operation

36:03 – David Victor “Greenfinger” scenario

36:31 – Joshua B. Horton, et al. – Who Could Deploy Stratospheric Aerosol Injection? The United States, China, and Large-Scale, Rapid Planetary Cooling

42:26 – Injecting sulfur dioxide at multiple latitudes allows some tailoring of the resulting climate response

42:52 – Reverse colonization claims about stratospheric sulfur injection

44:54 – Who Owns the World’s Fossil Fuels?

45:19 – Moral hazard

46:07 – Termination shock

49:38 – Edward Parson and Holly Buck – Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: The Problem of Phasedown

53:12 – EU call for temporary ban on solar geoengineering technologies, climate vulnerable nations reject U.S.-led push for solar geoengineering

53:34 – Global initiative for non-use agreement regarding solar geoengineering

57:55 – Kim Stanley Robinson – The Ministry for the Future, TGS Episode

1:00:35 – Edward Parson and Jesse Reynolds – Solar geoengineering: Scenarios of future governance challenges

1:02:33 – Planetary boundaries

1:02:37 – Failure to adopt emissions reductions from Paris Climate Agreement, failure to deliver on climate adaptation funds

1:03:56 – Edward Parson – Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy

1:04:01 – Edward Parson – The Montreal Protocol: The First Adaptive Global Environmental Regime? 

1:08:20 – Research involving alternatives to sulfate aerosols, risks posed by stratospheric aerosol injection 

1:10:08 – Global sulfur dioxide emissions 1750-2022

1:10:17 – IMO limit on sulphur content in ship fuel

1:10:24 – Leon Simons on TGS, Paper on Impact of Declining Aerosol Emissions on Climate

1:10:44 – Zeke Hausfather and David Keith – Turns Out Air Pollution Was Good for Something

1:11:48 – Extreme fires in Spain and California this year, Mediterranean and Western Europe heat extremes

1:12:44 – Joshua B. Horton and David W. Keith – Multilateral parametric climate risk insurance: a tool to facilitate agreement about deployment of solar geoengineering?

1:17:30 – Degrees Global Forum meeting in South Africa

Back to episodes
Terror Management TheoryWith Sheldon SolomonThe Great SimplificationEp 199 | Sheldon Solomon

Many of us wrestle with the unsettling truth that everyone – including ourselves and those we love – will one day die. Though this awareness is uncomfortable, research suggests that the human capacity to contemplate death is a byproduct of consciousness itself. In fact, our efforts to cope with mortality are at the core of culture, religion, the desire for wealth, and even many of today’s societal crises. How might a deeper understanding of our implicit reactions to mortality help us turn towards responses that are more supportive of our species and planet?

Watch nowOct 29, 2025
Challenging Monopoly PowerWith Stacy MitchellThe Great SimplificationEp 198 | Stacy Mitchell

Monopolistic business practices have been illegal in the United States for more than a century. Yet, monopoly power continues to accelerate in our modern commercial landscape. Large, powerful corporations edge out smaller businesses, often citing scale, “efficiency”, and lower costs as their reasons for success. But looking more closely reveals a reality that is far different. Small businesses are more cost-effective and deliver better results to the people they serve than giant corporations. Furthermore, they form the backbone of engaged and connected communities. So what is actually preventing small businesses (and communities) from flourishing, and what can individuals do today to build economic power in their communities? 

Watch nowOct 22, 2025
Will Coral Reefs Be Gone by 2050?With Ove Hoegh-GuldbergThe Great SimplificationEp 197 | Ove Hoegh-Guldberg

Twenty-five years ago, a landmark paper warned that the world’s coral reefs could vanish by 2050. Now, halfway to that projected date (and amid ever more frequent coral bleaching events), that grim prediction feels increasingly close to reality. What is the current state of Earth’s coral reefs, and what would happen to our planetary home without them?

Watch nowOct 15, 2025

Subscribe to our Substack

The Institute for the Study of Energy and Our Future (ISEOF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, founded in 2008, that conducts research and educates the public about energy issues and their impact on society.

Support our work
Get in touch
x