Great simplification pulsing lines

Ep 82  |  Kevin Anderson

Kevin Anderson: “The Uncomfortable Link between Climate and Equity”

Check out this podcast

TGS82 Kevin Anderson The Great Simplification

Show Summary

On this episode, Nate is joined by climate scientist Kevin Anderson to discuss the possible paths of averting severe climate outcomes and how this is interconnected with equity. As nations plan their climate goals and coordinate with each other, it’s clear that extreme actions would be needed from everyone to meet the goal of keeping the global average temperature increase below 2ºC – if this is even possible. At the same time, there are wide disparities in the greenhouse gas emissions between the materially wealthiest and poorest within and across countries. How are past inequities already affecting people in presently climate impacted zones? How can concerned individuals begin incorporating changes and communicating with others in their own lives – and is it even worth it to do so? How can we attempt to balance the equity in standards of living and create rapid reductions in emissions, all while grappling with growing geopolitical tensions, declining energy availability, and the multitude of other converging risks in this impending poly-crisis.

About Kevin Anderson

Kevin is professor of Energy and Climate Change at the University of Manchester and visiting professor at the Universities of Uppsala (Sweden) and Bergen (Norway). Formerly he held the position of Zennström professor (in Uppsala) and was director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research (UK). Kevin engages widely with governments, industry and civil society, and remains research active with publications in Climate policy, Nature and Science. He has a decade’s industrial experience in the petrochemical industry, is a chartered engineer and fellow of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers.

In French, we have a motto that says that a simple drawing is often better than a long explanation. Jean-Marc Jancovici Carbone 4 President

That’s very understandable because with left atmosphere thinking, one of the problems is that you see everything as a series of problems that must have solutions. Iain McGilchrist Neuroscientist and Philosopher

We can’t have hundreds and hundreds of real relationships that are healthy because that requires time and effort and full attention and awareness of being in real relationship and conversation with the other human. Nate Hagens Director of ISEOF

This is the crux of the whole problem. Individual parts of nature are more valuable than the biocomplexity of nature. Thomas Crowther Founder Restor

Show Notes & Links to Learn More

Download transcript

Suggested Reading from Kevin Anderson on inequity reinforcement in the IPCC Working Group III Models: IPCC scenarios project highly unequal future between North and South, Equity Assessment of Global Mitigation Pathways in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report

00:00 – Kevin Anderson Works + Info, Climate Uncensored

06:43 – 2 consecutive days of record hot temperatures for the last 100,000 years

07:30 – Length and increasing accuracy of global temperature measurements

10:50 – Don’t Look Up

16:45 – Energy consumption reduction after 2008 recession

19:49 – Lucas Chancel and Thomas Piketty

20:18 – 50% of emissions come from 10% of the population

20:30 – The top 1% produce twice as much CO2 as the bottom half

24:32 – Economic models with greater levels of equity tend to be more aligned with climate

24:47 – A majority of fertilizer goes to producing animal feed

25:30 – If top 10% of global emitters reduced their emissions to the average European (6 tonnes/person), and nothing else changed, that would cut CO2 by ⅓

27:12 – Emissions have risen by 60% since the first IPCC report

29:58 – Ukraine/Russia War and Effects

30:20 – Global North Debt

30:48 – Complex 6-continent supply chain

32:47 – Roosevelt’s Fireside Chats

36:48 – Likelihood of 1.5 degrees, 2 degrees

36:54 – Peak Oil

38:58 – Planetary Boundaries

41:57 – Every .1 degree is worth fighting for

43:24 – James Hansen, New Paper

47:30 – Carbon Budget

50:17 – Most homes in the US are very poor quality in terms of energy efficiency

52:27 – Carbon Pulse

1:05:08 – Regenerative Agriculture

1:06:40 – Sequestration technologies are in their infancy and are not a guarantee

1:09:50 – Renewables aren’t substituting fossil energy, but adding to total energy currently

1:10:40 – Ecological Economics

1:11:00 – Care Economies

1:12:06 – Economics for the Future – Beyond the Superorganism

1:16:15 – The rise of anti-establishment

1:23:28 – Successful social change has required protesting historically

1:24:12 – Taimur Ahmad TGS Episode

1:26:35 – Emergence

Back to episodes
End of Year ReflectionsWith Nate HagensThe Great SimplificationEp 205 | Nate Hagens

In this week’s episode, Nate reflects on four years(!) of the podcast by answering listener-submitted questions, which cover a broad range of topics related to The Great Simplification. He invites subscribers to investigate how they navigate a complex and ever-changing world, while avoiding overly prescriptive solutions that brush aside personal agency and the inherent uncertainty that exists in our world.

Watch nowDec 17, 2025
Fighting for a Livable FutureWith Kelly ErhartThe Great SimplificationEp 204 | Kelly Erhart

While current conversations about global heating tend to center around a few well-established pieces of science, we don’t often hear about the scientists and leaders working at the frontier of what is still unknown about Earth’s systems. This includes unpredictable tipping points and cascading effects of our rapidly changing climate, as well as the unconventional adaptation strategies that might help us maintain a stable planet. What is the newest climate science being researched right now, and what areas are we still needing to explore as we fight for a livable future? 

Watch nowDec 10, 2025
If Anyone Builds It, Everyone DiesWith Nate SoaresThe Great SimplificationEp 203 | Nate Soares

Technological development has always been a double-edged sword for humanity: the printing press increased the spread of misinformation, cars disrupted the fabric of our cities, and social media has made us increasingly polarized and lonely. But it has not been since the invention of the nuclear bomb that technology has presented such a severe existential risk to humanity – until now, with the possibility of Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) on the horizon. Were ASI to come to fruition, it would be so powerful that it would outcompete human beings in everything – from scientific discovery to strategic warfare. What might happen to our species if we reach this point of singularity, and how can we steer away from the worst outcomes?

Watch nowDec 3, 2025

Subscribe to our Substack

The Institute for the Study of Energy and Our Future (ISEOF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, founded in 2008, that conducts research and educates the public about energy issues and their impact on society.

Support our work
Get in touch
x