Great simplification pulsing lines

Ep 88  |  Robert Sapolsky

Robert Sapolsky: “The Brain, Determinism, and Cultural Implications”

Check out this podcast

TGS88 Robert Sapolsky The Great Simplification

Show Summary

On this episode, neuroscientist and author Robert Sapolsky joins Nate to discuss the structure of the human brain and its implication on behavior and our ability to change. Dr. Sapolsky also unpacks how the innate quality of a biological organism shaped by evolution and the surrounding environment – meaning all animals, including humans – leads him to believe that there is no such thing as free will, at least how we think about it today. How do our past and present hormone levels, hunger, stress, and more affect the way we make decisions? What implications does this have in a future headed towards lower energy and resource availability? How can our species manage the mismatch of our evolutionary biology with our modern day challenges – and navigate through a ‘determined’ future?

About Robert Sapolsky

Robert Sapolsky is professor of biology and neurology at Stanford University and a research associate with the Institute of Primate Research at the National Museum of Kenya. Over the past thirty years, he has divided his time between the lab, where he studies how stress hormones can damage the brain, and in East Africa, where he studies the impact of chronic stress on the health of baboons. Sapolsky is author of several books, including Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers, A Primate’s Memoir, Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst, and his newest book coming out in October, Determined: Life Without Free Will. He lives with his family in San Francisco.

In French, we have a motto that says that a simple drawing is often better than a long explanation. Jean-Marc Jancovici Carbone 4 President

That’s very understandable because with left atmosphere thinking, one of the problems is that you see everything as a series of problems that must have solutions. Iain McGilchrist Neuroscientist and Philosopher

We can’t have hundreds and hundreds of real relationships that are healthy because that requires time and effort and full attention and awareness of being in real relationship and conversation with the other human. Nate Hagens Director of ISEOF

This is the crux of the whole problem. Individual parts of nature are more valuable than the biocomplexity of nature. Thomas Crowther Founder Restor

Show Notes & Links to Learn More

Download transcript

00:20 – Robert Sapolsky Info + Works, Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will

06:30 – Evolutionary mismatch

07:53 – History of the separation of mind and body (Dualism)

08:01 – Descartes

12:52 – Biological roots of religiosity

18:12 – Testosterone amplifies learned behaviors

20:45 – We give social status to aggression

22:02 – Dopamine is about the anticipation of reward

24:55 – Dopamine habituation

27:10 – Dopamin resetting

29:33 – Oxytocin causes familial attachment and eventually pair bonding and cooperation

30:45 – Dogs and humans secrete oxytocin when looking at each other

31:30 – Oxytocin makes us prosocial to our in-group and anti-social to our out-group

34:48 – Past stress levels affect current decisions that we make

35:58 – By the 3rd trimester the mother’s socioeconomic status is affecting a fetus’ hormones

36:50 – Daily temps in a city are a significant predictor of violence levels

37:13 – The structure of the brain is different between urban and rural residents

38:58 – Returns on investing in early life 

39:45 – Non-mendelian inheritance of traits

40:40 – Societal adversity can have multi-generational effects

41:09 – Neuroplasticity

42:17 – What is free will?

42:26 – Behave: Biology of Humans at their Best and Worst

49:38 – Compatibilists

50:04 – Cognitive Dissonance

53:13 – Victor Frankl quote

56:10 – People treat ‘attractive’ people better

57:02 – African American men with more eurocentric traits are less likely to get convicted

1:12:15 – The prefrontal cortex

1:13:16 – Emergence

1:13:27 – The neuron of a fruit fly and the neuron of a human are the same, but humans have 100 million for every one that a fly has

1:18:20 – Quantum Indeterminacy

1:19:25 – Charles Goodnight, multilevel selection

1:21:15 – David Sloan Wilson

1:21:30 – E.O. Wilson

1:24:28 – Meritocracy

1:28:17 – History of epilepsy

1:29:23 – Determinism, Fatalism, Nihilism

1:36:55 – Richard DawkinsThe Selfish Gene

Back to episodes
If Anyone Builds It, Everyone DiesWith Nate SoaresThe Great SimplificationEp 203 | Nate Soares

Technological development has always been a double-edged sword for humanity: the printing press increased the spread of misinformation, cars disrupted the fabric of our cities, and social media has made us increasingly polarized and lonely. But it has not been since the invention of the nuclear bomb that technology has presented such a severe existential risk to humanity – until now, with the possibility of Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) on the horizon. Were ASI to come to fruition, it would be so powerful that it would outcompete human beings in everything – from scientific discovery to strategic warfare. What might happen to our species if we reach this point of singularity, and how can we steer away from the worst outcomes?

Watch nowDec 3, 2025
Reimagining Ourselves at the End of the WorldWith Samantha SweetwaterThe Great SimplificationEp 202 | Samantha Sweetwater

Over the past decade, the world has become increasingly chaotic and uncertain – and so, too, has our cultural vision for the future. While the events we face now may feel unprecedented, they are rooted in much deeper patterns, which humanity has been playing out for millennia. If we take the time to understand past trends, we can also employ practices and philosophies that might counteract them –  such as focusing on kinship, intimacy, and resilience – to help pave the way for a better future. How might we nurture the foundations of a different kind of society, even while the end of our current civilization plays out around us?

Watch nowNov 24, 2025
Two Ways of KnowingWith Rosa Vásquez EspinozaThe Great SimplificationEp 201 | Rosa Vásquez Espinoza

For centuries, modern science has relied on the scientific method to better understand the world around us. While helpful in many contexts, the scientific method is also objective, controlled, and reductionist – often breaking down complex systems into smaller parts for analysis and isolating subjects to test hypotheses. In contrast, indigenous wisdom is deeply contextual, rooted in lived experience, and emphasizes a reciprocal, integrated relationship with the rest of the natural world, viewing all parts of the system as interconnected. What becomes possible when we combine the strengths of each of these knowledge systems as we navigate humanity’s biggest challenges? 

Watch nowNov 19, 2025

Subscribe to our Substack

The Institute for the Study of Energy and Our Future (ISEOF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, founded in 2008, that conducts research and educates the public about energy issues and their impact on society.

Support our work
Get in touch
x