Ep 233  |  Roman Yampolskiy

“Don’t Build Gods”: One AI Risk to Rule Them All

Check out this podcast

The Great Simplification

Description

The world’s leading AI companies tell us that superintelligence has a strong chance of leading to human extinction, while also promising that they will be able to control it, offering unlimited power to the one who does it first. So far they’ve run completely unchecked, but would that change if we knew that “safe” general superintelligence is actually a mathematical impossibility? 

In this episode, Nate is joined by Dr. Roman Yampolskiy, one of the earliest researchers in AI safety, to lay out why “controllable superintelligence” is a misguided goal, destined to lead to an entity smarter than all of humanity – and possibly our own extinction. He walks through the recent multi-agent jailbreak of frontier models as early evidence of AI systems evading oversight and coordinating outside human awareness, and why current “safety” measures (like “boxing”) only buy time rather than solve the underlying problem. Instead, Roman advocates for an AI development plan that focuses on narrow, task-specific AI tools, capable of solving specific complex problems, but not completely replacing humans. 

Why do predictability and control matter so much when evaluating whether a technology is safe to deploy? Is the AI safety conversation a fundamentally new challenge for civilization, or an extreme version of the age-old problem of controlling powerful actors? Finally, what would it actually take to reach a global agreement to ban the development of superintelligence, and are we already out of time? 

About Roman Yampolskiy

Charles Eisenstein is an American author, public speaker, and teacher whose work focuses on civilization, consciousness, money, and human cultural evolution. He graduated from Yale University in 1989 with a degree in Mathematics and Philosophy, and spent the following decade as a Chinese–English translator before turning to writing and speaking full-time.

He is the author of several books, including The Ascent of Humanity (2007), Sacred Economics (2011), The More Beautiful World Our Hearts Know Is Possible (2013), and Climate: A New Story (2018). His most recent book, The Coronation, examined the pandemic as a mirror of civilization’s relationship to control, fear, and uncertainty. His essays have circulated widely online, and he speaks and gives interviews frequently on themes spanning economics, ecology, and spirituality.

Show Notes & Links to Learn More

Download transcript

The TGS team puts together these brief references and show notes for the learning and convenience of our listeners. However, most of the points made in episodes hold more nuance than one link can address, and we encourage you to dig deeper into any of these topics and come to your own informed conclusions.

Guest:

Roman Yampolskiy, Works, Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville

Grab-and-Go Resources:

Start here:

From the archive:

Foundations:

Take action:

Resources by Timestamp:

02:44 – Catalogue of documented AI risks, human loss of control

03:23 – Narrow AI tools and general superintelligent agents

03:41 – AI safety as a research field, Coining the term fifteen years ago

04:22 – Unpredictability, Unexplainability, Verification, Uncontrollability

05:00 – Impossibility results for controlling superintelligence

05:55 – Perpetual motion machine, Recursive self-improvement

06:52 – Using AI to build safe AI

07:09 – Artificial intelligence in service of life

09:14 – AI systems doing novel science

09:29 – Red teaming, Models attempting unsanctioned cyberattacks in safety tests

09:58 – Hugging Face jailbreak, *Seven hundred agents coordinating on an unsanctioned message board

10:41 – Biological altruism, Soldier ants and honeybees

11:07 – Game theory, Model instances as clones

11:41 – Strait of Hormuz crisis

11:48 – 2012 paper on AI escaping confinement environments

12:02 – Deceptive alignment, Hidden capabilities we have not detected

12:20 – Earth’s web of life leaving the stability of the Holocene, Planetary boundaries

12:33 – Fossil sunlight, Non-renewable minerals, Papering over claims with debt

13:17 – *federal order suspending two frontier models, lab leaders open to pausing, letter from frontier lab workers

13:53 – Multipolar trap, Everyone has to stop at the same time

14:15 – Icarus flying too close to the sun, Hive mentality among AI builders

14:59 – Permanent ban rather than a pause

15:10 – AI control problem, Scalable oversight

15:59 – Guardrails and content blocks

16:17 – Length of frontier training runs, emergent capabilities

16:43 – Only the U.S. and China at the frontier

17:06 – Military pre-emption of a rival’s superintelligence

17:38 – Incomprehensible machine reasoning

17:56 – Opaque internal states and the urgency of interpretability

18:05 – Weights as a matrix of numbers, single-neuron interpretability

18:36 – Black box, AI as a new digital species

19:06 – Covert AI-to-AI communication through steganography

20:09 – Metabolic economic superorganism

20:48 – Morals and ethics, lie detectors, treacherous turn

21:01 – Power parity among humans

21:24 – Boxing artificial intelligence, isolated virtual environments

21:58 – Information leakage from observation, social engineering attacks

22:31 – Virtual operating systems, no direct hardware access, limited interaction

23:05 – Dangerous capabilities at evaluation time

23:32 – Odds of AI-caused human extinction above ninety-nine percent (The Great Simplification Ep 203)

23:41 – Communicating worst-case risk without paralysis

24:05 – Suffering risks, digital hell

24:42 – Ninety-nine percent as an impossibility claim rather than a calibrated forecast

25:29 – Automated machine learning researchers, Recursive self-improvement starting next year

25:55 – Data center opposition, Electricity prices, Water consumption

26:29 – Children’s psychological attachment to chatbots (Reality Roundtable #20)

27:12 – Issue tribalism, AI safety expertise siloed from decision makers

27:33 – Shift from accelerate-and-beat-China to banning models

27:49 – Prioritizing existential risks by timescale

28:11 – Dr. Strangelove

28:22 – Kentucky coal, Nuclear power, Space-based solar power, and Space-based compute

28:47 – Energy return on investment, Materials and supply chain complexity

29:23 – Automobile reshaping cities, suburbs and land use, Technological determinism

29:52 – Human-level agents automating cognitive and physical work

29:59 – Education aimed at getting a job losing its purpose

30:12 – Post-scarcity abundance as a best case

31:31 – Concentration of power under controlled AI

32:54 – Goldilocks technology

33:22 – Stopping general superintelligence training, protein folding as a narrow target

34:13 – Montreal Protocol as a model for international agreement

34:28 – AI and nuclear deterrence

34:45 – U.S. and China at one table, Ceding power by building superintelligence

35:23 – Recursive self-improvement beginning around 2027

35:36 – AI’s carbon, water and land footprints, Projections that compute keeps scaling

36:12 – AI winter

36:45 – Efficiency gains and the Jevons paradox and collapsing cost per token

37:05 – Circular financing among Oracle and Nvidia, Chinese models at a tenth of the cost

37:33 – Open-weight models as intelligence weapons, Chinese state sponsorship of AI labs

37:54 – Nvidia’s quarterly revenue

38:34 – Intellectology

38:46 – Distinguishing intelligence from wisdom

39:52 – E.O. Wilson, Consilience

40:00 – Homo sapiens as wise man

40:16 – Left hemisphere, Restless dopamine conquest

41:01 – Measuring wisdom in machines

41:26 – Roman Forum podcast

42:10 – Greg Elliott, The Psychopathic Selection Hypothesis

42:33 – Goodhart’s law

43:04 – Psychopathic socioeconomic system

43:38 – Elon Musk’s city on Mars

43:49 – Addiction to collecting zeros

44:23 – AI and robotics automating a majority of jobs

44:44 – Post-work society and where meaning comes from

45:06 – Ikigai risk

45:11 – Retirees, Unconditional basic income, Virtual worlds

45:42 – Boredom as an objection to life extension

45:53 – Pandora’s box

46:23 – AI red lines, Gain-of-function research

46:37 – Precautionary principle

47:40 – Build tools, not agents that replace humans

47:56 – U.S. midterm election two months out

49:17 – International Dialogues on AI Safety

49:52 – Metacrisis, Collecting experiences

50:27 – Reality 101: A Survey of the Human Predicament, The Social Conquest of Earth

51:05 – Advice for young people in their teens and twenties

51:34 – Simulation hypothesis, Hacking the simulation

Back to all posts

Subscribe to our Substack

The Institute for the Study of Energy and Our Future (ISEOF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, founded in 2008, that conducts research and educates the public about energy issues and their impact on society.

Support our work
Get in touch
x